Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

by stevieb (Canon)

on May 05, 2022 at 22:27 UTC ( #11143608=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?
in thread Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

It would be prudent and helpful to explain what you're replacing, and why.

Comment on Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://11143608]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others perusing the Monastery: (1)

Tux

As of 2023-03-31 02:30 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Notices^?