Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

by misterperl (Pilgrim)

on May 05, 2022 at 19:54 UTC ( #11143604=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?
in thread Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

I like your "style" sir - I do that but I realize I could do MORE of that. Making perl "english-like" and avoiding loops make life so much more readable.. AND using strict and bareblocks to minimize scope..

I ++'d you :)

Comment on Re^2: Is there a cleaner way to write this code below, which includes derferencing references, that themselves have to be dereferenced?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://11143604]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others contemplating the Monastery: (3)

As of 2023-06-06 12:32 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Notices^?