Re^4: Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks

Re^4: Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback

by bliako (Monsignor)

on Jul 30, 2021 at 08:06 UTC ( [id://11135518]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback
in thread Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback

apropos Test::CheckManifest being a requirement, I was just scanning all files for external packages and I saw that in t/manifest.t created by module-starter

#!perl
use 5.006;
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;

unless ( $ENV{RELEASE_TESTING} ) {
    plan( skip_all => "Author tests not required for installation" );
}

my $min_tcm = 0.9;
eval "use Test::CheckManifest $min_tcm";
plan skip_all => "Test::CheckManifest $min_tcm required" if $@;

ok_manifest();
[download]

Comment on Re^4: Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Inline::CUDA : looking for feedback
by kcott (Archbishop) on Jul 30, 2021 at 09:22 UTC

The issue isn't so much that module-starter adds a use Test::CheckManifest to t/manifest.t; rather, it's that you added Test::CheckManifest under PREREQ_PM in Makefile.PL (module-starter doesn't do that).

I was questioning the inclusion of Test::CheckManifest in Makefile.PL, not its presence in t/manifest.t. I could tell (by inspection) that Test::CheckManifest in Makefile.PL would be a problem: I force-installed Test::CheckManifest to circumvent that issue.

Take a look at "Re: Perl tools for making code better" for an example of my equivalent of manifest.t, along with some related information.

— Ken

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Cool Uses for Perl