Just noticed a recent TPF Finding a shared vision of Perl post, which seems to indicate that TPF endorsed the Gobby survey (see the "Our Methodology" section of the TPF post). I've quoted the relevant section of this post below:

Being at an early stage, this research is exploratory. We presented a series of seed questions and used the innovative Gobby platform for participants to share their own thoughts on what needs to be addressed.

These seed questions were:

• What’s your connection with Perl and its ecosystem?
• What do you see as the Perl ecosystem’s core values and initiatives?
• What are your future aspirations for Perl?
• What do you perceive are the main challenges of unifying the Perl community, culture, and governance with a shared vision?
• As an individual, how might you support Perl in the future?
• How could Perl community groups contribute to our long term goals?
• How can The Perl Foundation help the community achieve their long term goals?

One of the interesting features of Gobby is that participants can vote for other peoples' responses with the effect of moving them higher up the list when viewed by the next participants. However, the number of votes should not be used as part of a quantitative analysis because:

• one person could have filled the survey in multiple times;
• many statements could have multiple interpretations; and
• the most insightful statement may have been added by the last person filling in the survey

The survey results can be seen from a link in the TPF post.