Re^3: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 14, 2015 at 08:48 UTC
Has anyone been able to decipher the (surely profound) meaning behind this mysterious "reply to the wrong post" tactic? The idea appears to be that if the intended target of his post doesn't get a "you've a reply" /msg, then it may take longer for them to reply to it. And the longer the post goes without a response, the more likely it is to pick up a few stray upvotes from those that either don't actually read the posts they upvote, or are fooled by his "style" into believing he has something to contribute. Do you think that the Perl foundation would fund giving this guy a commission (via an undisclosed third party), in order to discover just how little he knows? MS are (finally) starting to fund the taking down of those "We're MS support and we've detected you've got a virus" scam companies. Maybe Perl should do a little housekeeping too. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]
Re^4: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 14, 2015 at 07:23 UTC
No meaning, its simple spammer logic 1. avoid direct interaction whenever possible 2. generate more hits constant spammer sundialsvc4 is Mike Robinson always ignoring complaints	[reply]
Re^4: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jan 14, 2015 at 08:43 UTC
Please see Dark triad for details. Best regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]
Re^5: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jan 14, 2015 at 17:26 UTC
Whatever is going on, or has been, I object to this vilification. I have never detected a hint of malevolence or any of the three would-be pillars described on that wiki page.	[reply]
Re^6: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 15, 2015 at 13:19 UTC
I concur. What is happening now is essentially cyber-bullying, and it should stop. If one feels such a way about another poster, then apply the troll rule. (Namely: Ignore, don't feed.) I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^7: RAM: It isn't free . . . (the aggrieved troll their troll) by tye (Sage) on Jan 15, 2015 at 15:14 UTC
Re^8: RAM: It isn't free . . . (CSS snippet to hide post bodies) by shmem (Chancellor) on Jan 15, 2015 at 18:45 UTC
Re^7: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 15, 2015 at 22:04 UTC
Re^6: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Jan 15, 2015 at 09:03 UTC
The belive in the own grandiosity as well the permanent attention seeking is narcissistic. And causing confusion, trouble, irritation and annoyance year in, year out is anti-social. Regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]
Re^6: RAM: It isn't free . . . (Mike "sundialsvc4" Robinson spams himself) by Anonymous Monk on Jan 14, 2015 at 22:29 UTC
Whatever is going on, or has been, I object to this vilification. I have never detected a hint of malevolence or any of the three would-be pillars described on that wiki page. Hmm, spamming for profit, not malevolent?	[reply]
Re^7: RAM: It isn't free . . . by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jan 14, 2015 at 22:45 UTC
Re^8: RAM: It isn't free . . . by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 14, 2015 at 22:56 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks