Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?

by perlfan (Vicar)
on Apr 14, 2021 at 03:29 UTC ( [id://11131243]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?

Breaking symmetry with a regex
  • Comment on Re: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?
by hrcerq (Scribe) on Apr 15, 2021 at 19:28 UTC

    At first I didn't understand what you meant by linking to this other thread. But now I've joined pieces together:

    • It appeared right after this one;
    • The data pattern is pretty close to the one I describe here;
    • It was created by some anonymous monk.

    I'm not saying you're implying anything (as you might just be pointing something related that might help, in fact I believe that's the case), but anyway I'd like to mention I'm not that anonymous monk, as I'm aware it could be understood as duplicating threads somehow, which is not cool.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11131243]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-25 22:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found