Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?by LanX (Saint) |
on Apr 03, 2021 at 16:55 UTC ( [id://11130780]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hi thanks, I don't care about 'no strict'. Solutions are available by parsing the optree like demonstrated in B::Xref B::Concise and B::Deparse But patching them means reinventing the wheel, which I tried to avoid. > I'm not sure I agree I had the discussion here not long ago. The perldocs are contradictory since our was introduced. Lexical is a term borrowed from lisp for variables which have no dynamic scope, but only in the readable block.(lexical ~ like written) You know I'm picky about terminology, calling my "private" and package vars "public" would have been better.
Cheers Rolf See also Re^3: Unusual variable declaration ff
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|