Re^2: Difference between executing and "using" a .pm file

Generally speaking, a modulino uses the .pl extension

Interesting. Because the modulino link I provided was actually in my browser history because of your Re: Need to know the process to implement perl script into web application server.... and that link you provided shows a file named examples/modulino.pm and he runs it as perl modulino.pm. So it's not completely unheard of to have the modulino as a .pm, not a .pl

It seems there are really two use cases for modulino:

having a script, and wanting to slowly turn it into a module (ie, your use case)
having a module, and wanting to do something without having to write a separate .pl to call it, like validate, test, or run under default conditions (ie, the case that gszabo seems to be espousing in the article, and that Marshall wants and LanX gave examples of)

Both seem reasonable uses of the concept, to me.

Comment on Re^2: Difference between executing and "using" a .pm file Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Difference between executing and "using" a .pm file by LanX (Saint) on Mar 31, 2021 at 01:13 UTC
I think this Rescue-legacy-code-with-modulinos is the central article on the topic with a lot of links and historical context. Especially b/c Brian states that he didn't invent but popularized the concept. (he even cites a Perlmonks' thread as earliest reference for the term "modulino") He describes it primarily as a way to `perl Module.pm` with a meaningful effect. (A) But in the second part of this article he describes the other way round from initial `require script.pl` to renaming `pl` -> `pm` at the end. (B) I.O.W. how he's using this technique to transform legacy code into modules. Actually that's quite a interesting and powerful strategy. I'm certain I've seen this article multiple times before, but can't remember reading this part anymore. And I think that's not surprising. We have to realize that this (B) direction involves far more refactoring, while the former (A) can be already achieved with just one single additional line. I'd say it's safe to say that >95% of all modulinos out there belong to the A-category of runnable modules, and that's what the majority remembers. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Difference between executing and "using" a .pm file by perlfan (Vicar) on Mar 30, 2021 at 23:36 UTC
> he runs it as perl modulino.pm I didn't realize that, but that just goes to show you TIMTOWDI :). And I agree with your use cases above; though I use it often for case #1 and have never had the need for #2. Thank you.	[reply]


Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
	PerlMonks