http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11127348


in reply to guidance on naming my first module for CPAN

I'd look to see where it might fit into CPAN's current hierarchy. A MetaCPAN search on Extract may help. As a general thing you should avoid generating top level nodes on CPAN and neither LG nor QuickMemo\w* are current top level nodes.

Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond
  • Comment on Re: guidance on naming my first module for CPAN

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: guidance on naming my first module for CPAN
by davido (Cardinal) on Jan 23, 2021 at 23:38 UTC

    This "top level" discussion is a good call. Perhaps something in the Data:: namespace. Data::QuickMemoPlus::Extract, for example.


    Dave