Re^8: Distinguish between missing and undefined arguments with subroutine signatures (methods with signatures?)

If you are talking about compile-time checking ...

No, I'm not talking about compile-time checking. I want method call checking at runtime. My sig_lexical example does what I want, but I'm not sure if this is a legal usage.

Greetings,
-jo

$gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$

Comment on Re^8: Distinguish between missing and undefined arguments with subroutine signatures (methods with signatures?) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Distinguish between missing and undefined arguments with subroutine signatures (methods with signatures?) by LanX (Saint) on Dec 27, 2020 at 21:59 UTC
> I want method call checking at runtime I can't follow anymore. You want 1 argument for a setter, and 0 arguments for a getter. Hence you need a conditional check anyway. So use a `@slurpy` parameter and check the size at runtime. Then `die "too many arguments" if @slurpy > 1` Problem solved. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks