Your reply is flawed inasmuch as OP is correct, as per the docs I quoted/linked to use JSON; does as they believe it does. Your response doesn't answer that question and muddies the waters by introducing a different module. The answer to the question you quoted is in the module documentation.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] [d/l] |
Still not clicking for me. I'll give it a few days to see if any of this makes sense to be because right it now doesn't. I don't give a shit about the negative XP but I do certainly care about "muddying the waters" or giving out bad info, which is the opposite of what I want to do.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Think of it this way:
OP: "Does X behave like this..."
You: "I believe you're thinking of Y....."
Me: "Did you look at the X docs?....."
The docs for X clearly support OPs thoughts on the matter, and it's trivial to check that X does as believed.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |