http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11122611


in reply to Reaped: Re: *::Tiny modules namespace origins
in thread *::Tiny modules namespace origins

Do you have any data to back up the claim that they are no longer maintained, to any bigger extent than other modules? I'd say this is a superstition.

Tiny and simple modules do have, sort of by design, a better chance to reach stability than the average module, and thus may need less maintenance. That's why they will remain relevant, in particular if you bundle them with an application.

  • Comment on Re^2: *::Tiny modules namespace origins