Re^16: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff (don't feed)

in reply to Re^15: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff (don't feed)
in thread What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff

FORTRAN after 1977 adopted 11 years cycle for new versions

I'm sorry to say that this assertion is utterly without basis. Here are the release dates of the Fortran versions post-77:

Version	Year of release	Years since previous release
Fortran 90	1992	14
Fortran 95	1996	4
Fortran 2003	2004	8
Fortran 2008	2010	6
Fortran 2018	2018	10

Should it be possible on perlmonks to criticize some aspects of Perl 5 current features and implementation as well as its use without being denigrated as a reward?

Sure, criticize away. However, everyone else is also free to criticize your criticism. And when your criticism contains glaring factual errors such as your assertion about the Fortran release cycle then that somewhat undermines the credibility of the rest of your arguments.

Here endeth the feeding.

🦛

Comment on Re^16: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff (don't feed)

In Section Meditations