Re^12: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff by dave_the_m (Monsignor) on Sep 12, 2020 at 06:52 UTC
Both 1 and 2 looks to me like frivolities without any useful meaning or justification You and I have vastly differing perceptions of what constitutes normal perl code. For example there are over 700 examples of the 'postfix if on next line' pattern in the .pm files distributed with the perl core. There doesn't really seem any point in discussing this further. You have failed to convince me, and I am very unlikely to work on this myself or accept such a patch into core. Dave.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^13: What esteemed monks think about changes necessary/desirable in Perl 7 outside of OO staff by Jenda (Abbot) on Oct 17, 2020 at 18:51 UTC
The people who would want to use this pragma should better find a different language or drop programming completely. Also before someone starts suggesting changes to a language, they should bloody well learn that language! Jenda 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not a manual!	[reply]


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks