http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11120489


in reply to Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

There are far more situations where it might make sense to append or add something to a simple type.

Not so with refs, no way a .= or a += will lead to anything meaningful.

Well except when blessed and overloaded. But that's far fetched.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery