in reply to Re^5: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)
@a = map { $_ = 3; } [];
is no more or less junk than
@a = map { $_ = 3; } $x.$y;
Are you therefore talking about [] + 1? Making the reference read-only is not going to catch that.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^7: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 08, 2020 at 01:17 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 09, 2020 at 06:55 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 09, 2020 at 07:12 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 09, 2020 at 12:46 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 09, 2020 at 21:19 UTC | |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Aug 10, 2020 at 06:08 UTC | |
| |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 09, 2020 at 21:07 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Aug 09, 2020 at 23:45 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom