![]() |
|
more useful options | |
PerlMonks |
Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)by LanX (Sage) |
on Aug 06, 2020 at 12:26 UTC ( #11120424=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> I don't understand what of interest that's supposed to show. The fact that [...] resolves each time to a new AV was used as argument against being literal. Obviously most "literals" are not treated the way constants are. (with the exception of undef)
Cheers Rolf
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|