http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11120387


in reply to Re^9: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

> Run it through Deparse though,

And what do you think that proves?

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 06, 2020 at 05:26 UTC

    The same thing that you do: there's a subtlety of implementation that Deparse doesn't catch.