Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)

by LanX (Sage)

on Aug 06, 2020 at 01:35 UTC ( #11120387=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

> Run it through Deparse though,

And what do you think that proves?

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^10: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 06, 2020 at 05:26 UTC
The same thing that you do: there's a subtlety of implementation that Deparse doesn't catch.	[reply]
Re^12: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) by LanX (Sage) on Aug 06, 2020 at 11:57 UTC
Oh well, I see ... you caught the subtleties ... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]

Domain Nodelet^?

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://11120387]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others contemplating the Monastery: (1)

As of 2023-04-02 11:14 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found

Notices^?