![]() |
|
Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated)by LanX (Sage) |
on Aug 05, 2020 at 21:41 UTC ( #11120367=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> But regardless of that, there is still the question of whether the reference returned by [] and {} should be marked readonly. I suppose it could be but Larry never thought to do so, Thanks, at least someone beside Hauke who is not trying to convince me that the issue doesn't exist at all. \o/ > and there doesn't seem any point in changing it now. Well ... catching errors would be an issue, don't you think? But like always with old errors, I wouldn't surprised if they became "features". After changing, some CPAN modules might break because they did something like
which is a broken approach to default values ...
Cheers Rolf
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|