![]() |
|
We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly?by LanX (Sage) |
on Aug 05, 2020 at 17:56 UTC ( #11120332=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> Should @$ar1 and @$ar2 be treated differently, No, but what's the point to allow overwriting an alias for references without throwing an error? Should they be treated differently than 42, undef and "str", and if so, why? Again, I'm talking about the container, not the mutable content.
Cheers Rolf
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|