Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly?


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly?

by LanX (Sage)

on Aug 05, 2020 at 02:04 UTC ( #11120306=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Shouldn't references be readonly?
in thread Shouldn't LITERAL references be readonly? (updated)

please compare

  DB<30> x map { $_ = 1 } 2
Modification of a read-only value attempted at (eval 40)[c:/Perl_524/l
+ib/perl5db.pl:737] line 2.
  DB<31>
[download]

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^2: Shouldn't references be readonly? Download Code

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://11120306]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others musing on the Monastery: (3)

As of 2021-10-27 07:11 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

My first memorable Perl project was:

Results (91 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices^?