Re^3: Retitle tangents -9000

I can't think of a sensible argument for doing any of this. Users can either just ignore things, make a note to return to the post later if desired (thus maintaining focus), or start a new thread (provided it actually meets the criteria for being posted on the site).

Comment on Re^3: Retitle tangents -9000

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Retitle tangents -9000
by LanX (Saint) on Jul 15, 2020 at 17:10 UTC

Indicating ...

an (update)
Reason: courtesy, fairness (b/c there is no history feature here)
a sub thread which is a specialization and not a thread drift like here Re^4: Ternary Quizical behaviour? (Ref vs Alias) ,
Reason: sensible description in the title
a complete thread drift kind of Sundial-101 again (was: MongoDB) °
Reason: Total drift, but new title spares us from considering/messaging the cabals

> sensible argument for doing any of this

Overall reason:

we keep re-linking valuable nodes and the title appears automatically, Ref vs Alias is a far better title
we have node overviews, like best nodes etc.
inheriting (update) makes no sense at all

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

°) there are less controversial examples, please don't crucify me for mentioning the should not be named

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks