|
Re^2: Perl and MongoDB
by Fletch (Bishop) on Jul 08, 2020 at 20:50 UTC
|
Erm, (as usual . . .) no that's incorrect. They're deprecating it because they don't think it there's enough of an audience to warrant the development resources as they say here. Nothing to do with forcing you to use their cloud offerings, they're just not going to develop a perl driver themselves and in fact are offering tacit support to any community alternative that wants to start up.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
| [reply] |
Re^2: Perl and MongoDB
by Theodore (Friar) on Jul 10, 2020 at 08:25 UTC
|
The good news is that the abstraction layer is already there (as a separate Catalyst model), as the application was using an RDBMS in it's early versions, so no major restructuring is needed. I already had the "pleasure" to adapt this abstraction layer to newer MongoDB module versions (it started with v.0.700) :-) The "not an option for now" goes to replacing the whole application.
The cloud offerings are useless in this case, the application must run on premises for various reasons. Plus, I don't see how removing support for a language will push developers to use the cloud versions.
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
Re^2: Perl and MongoDB
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Jul 10, 2020 at 22:30 UTC
|
Dear sundialsvc4: after posting two consecutive nodes of drivel as yourself:
you outdo yourself by “anonymously” posting three consecutive nodes of claptrap:
followed by four consecutive nodes of codswallop:
Four in a row is a new record. Congratulations.
Update: To clarify, the four nodes being consecutive (i.e. node-ids: 11119144, 11119145, 11119146, 11119147) is what makes this a new record.
Update: 21-Nov-2020: New record. Nine in a row of utter bilge (node-ids: 11123927 - 11123935):
| [reply] |
|
|
Feeding time at the troll zoo, is it?
| [reply] |
|
|
Is your view that said feeding incites responses or that it increases trolling in general? I feel like both would be untrue. The only time the user in question has ever ceased to abuse the monastery was after some pretty serious concurrent backlash. The possibility of having his inanities, lies, and blundering as an attachment to his professional résumé seems to be the closest thing to a deterrent we have and a well indexed record of it is the best tool there is in that.
Update: missing preposition. :P
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
rather four thousands in a row
Well spotted, 4000 from a total of 4655 (plus "anon" posts) seems a sound conservative estimate.
What surprised me, and prompted my post, is that he'd managed
to garner four consecutive node-ids (11119144, 11119145, 11119146, 11119147).
Don't remember him achieving that before.
Whether that means he's replying faster - or the pace of this site has slowed down - I don't know.
| [reply] |
|
|
