Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^11: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

by bliako (Prior)
on Jul 08, 2020 at 08:15 UTC ( #11119030=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^10: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?
in thread Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

Well we wouldn't need any other languages if programmers were educated enough to use assembler.

It's a matter of productivity as well.

  • Comment on Re^11: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: Is there a problem with using barewords as filehandles ?
by LanX (Cardinal) on Jul 08, 2020 at 14:30 UTC
    > It's a matter of productivity as well

    That's what I tried to imply. :)

    BTW: You can be extremely productive in assembler with the right set of macros, but those macro sets finally evolve to a language like C.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      yes sorry, I missed the part about technique.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11119030]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2020-11-26 01:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?