Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Janitation History vs. Poster History

by LanX (Cardinal)
on Mar 07, 2020 at 23:43 UTC ( #11113954=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Janitation History vs. Poster History

Hi Ken,

I think it has been discussed many times before.

And I remember a time where even janitation history was not available to that extent.

Anyway I think we have more urgent problems atm than a complete edit history.

Though a "last edited" timestamp would certainly help in many cases.

This should be comparatively easy with a quick return of investment.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

  • Comment on Re: Janitation History vs. Poster History

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Janitation History vs. Poster History
by kcott (Bishop) on Mar 08, 2020 at 06:43 UTC

    G'day Rolf,

    Thanks for your response.

    I certainly wasn't trying to imply that there was any urgency for this. It's not something I'm desperate for; I just thought it would be a nice feature to have.

    Your 'a "last edited" timestamp' suggestion sounds like a good idea. Presumably, if there's no Janitation History, or the Janitation History shows a different timestamp, then edits must have been done by the OP.

    — Ken

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11113954]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-09-21 10:36 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    If at first I donít succeed, I Ö

    Results (125 votes). Check out past polls.