Re^2: Basic debugging checklist

in reply to Re: Basic debugging checklist
in thread Basic debugging checklist

I recently got bitten by doing this. The debugging messages were going to the web page. The code was misbehaving, but no debugging messages appeared. View Source explained why - because I had used < and >, they were being interpreted as HTML tags that made no sense & were ignored. Since then, I've been using square brackets.

Regards,

John Davies

Comment on Re^2: Basic debugging checklist

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Basic debugging checklist by LanX (Saint) on Mar 01, 2020 at 23:57 UTC
yeah that's why CGI::Carp translates `->` to `-ť` and so on, which makes some dumps hard to read. My preference to `<...>` over `[...]` stems from the fact that square brackets are easily confused as array syntax by the eye. I'd suggest to either double or invert the angle brackets, I doubt that `<<...>>` or `>...<` are easily confused as HTML tags. update I was wrong with the simple doubling, this `<<br>>` would be a a break surrounded by angles. Though this might help `->...<-` I'm open for other ASCII suggestions, i.e. avoiding unicode. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Basic debugging checklist by hippo (Bishop) on Mar 02, 2020 at 09:22 UTC
Mostly I use the apostrophe (ASCII 39 or x27). This helps as I'm used to seeing it delimiting strings so a "missing" terminator at a line end or one with preceding space appears obvious. In those rare occurrences where this is less effective because of the prevalence of apostrophes in the data corpus I sometimes use the tilde instead (ASCII 126 or x7E). HTH.	[reply]

In Section Tutorials

update