Re^3: unequal treatment

Daxim didn't suggest a change of the board's policy.

he kind of did -> Either restore my post or delete jdporter's.

Which of those two options is consistent with policy?

I didn't mean to add "fuel to the fire", just pointing out that daxim proved jdporter's original point.

It's no big deal.

Updated

Comment on Re^3: unequal treatment

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: unequal treatment by LanX (Archbishop) on Oct 27, 2019 at 16:09 UTC
You said > 1. jdporter laughs at ... jdporter didn't even reply in this thread, hence you are referring to the original thread. Where exactly did daxim talk there about board policy? I don't think that posting "alternative realities" helps calming down emotions. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}	[reply]
Re^5: unequal treatment by trippledubs (Deacon) on Oct 28, 2019 at 14:04 UTC
I only meant to pay two compliments: to jdporter for being correct and to daxim for following his own advice. I see you are using the morale high ground like a [no such wiki, muleta] and I am not hitting it. I really was trying to defuse with humor but maybe it needed a little more.. subtlety.	[reply]


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks