http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11108012


in reply to Re: unequal treatment
in thread unequal treatment

> 1. jdporter laughs at daxim's suggestion to just change the policy

Daxim didn't suggest a change of the board's policy.

No need to add fuel to the fire.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: unequal treatment
by trippledubs (Deacon) on Oct 27, 2019 at 12:16 UTC

    Daxim didn't suggest a change of the board's policy.

    he kind of did -> Either restore my post or delete jdporter's.

    Which of those two options is consistent with policy?

    I didn't mean to add "fuel to the fire", just pointing out that daxim proved jdporter's original point.

    It's no big deal.

    Updated

      You said

      > 1. jdporter laughs at ...

      jdporter didn't even reply in this thread, hence you are referring to the original thread.

      Where exactly did daxim talk there about board policy?

      I don't think that posting "alternative realities" helps calming down emotions.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

        I only meant to pay two compliments: to jdporter for being correct and to daxim for following his own advice. I see you are using the morale high ground like a [no such wiki, muleta] and I am not hitting it. I really was trying to defuse with humor but maybe it needed a little more.. subtlety.