Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re^2: unequal treatment

by Athanasius (Bishop)
on Oct 26, 2019 at 13:20 UTC ( #11107990=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: unequal treatment
in thread unequal treatment

I don't see who closed the consideration and when, but if a consideration receives enough "keep" votes, it gets removed from the node.

I did, earlier today. I don’t remember the exact tally, but I think the node had 6 “keep” votes, well above the 2 required to prevent reaping.

daxim: I’m sorry my action caused you offence. But the Consideration votes were such that the node could not be reaped under the guidelines, so I saw no point in leaving the node in Nodes to Consider.

I hope you understand that this is all standard procedure; also, that jdporter was not involved in the process.

Update: Please see What is Reaping?


Athanasius <°(((><contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11107990]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (3)
As of 2021-01-24 05:00 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?