Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

by haukex (Archbishop)
on Oct 14, 2019 at 20:55 UTC ( [id://11107457]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks
in thread Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks

why would we think that even they would welcome such a mention here?

See the text I quoted.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks
by 1nickt (Canon) on Oct 15, 2019 at 00:23 UTC

    That quote seems to me to exemplify the context I mentioned: that they don't want to be included in a Perl-focused site unless it's made clear that Raku's not Perl. I don't think you can interpret that small quote as seeking inclusion.


    The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
      I don't think you can interpret that small quote as seeking inclusion.

      I never claimed that, it was a counterpoint to your post.

      they don't want to be included in a Perl-focused site unless it's made clear that Raku's not Perl

      That's news to me (although as always, I'm open to being proven wrong). Are you sure that your apparent hatred of Perl 6 isn't affecting your interpretations?

        "I'm open to being proven wrong"

        That's good.


        The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

        Sigh. I've been following the Rakudists' debate for months. I'm not sure what your agenda is either in flogging the dead horse of "Raku is Perl" or in repeating old, irrelevant and untrue accusations about me (with links!) That post has 30 upvotes fyi. And your command of English is quite excellent enough to see that I made no mention there of hatred, simply asked the Rakudists to stand on their own two feet.

        Which they are now doing.

        You are trying to paint me with a broad and inaccurate brush. Why?

        Are you sure your advocacy of Raku isn't misplaced and outside of what the Rakudists themselves are seeking?

        Update: also just fyi I'm not interested in verbal jousting or circular wordplay masquerading as sophomoric "debate":

        why would we think that even they would welcome such a mention here?

        See the text I quoted.

        I don't think you can interpret that small quote as seeking inclusion.

        I never claimed that, it was a counterpoint to your post.

        As I said, sigh ...


        The way forward always starts with a minimal test.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11107457]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-29 12:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found