Re^2: Unit test of script fails unless Test::Warnings is used?!

I use Test::Exception all over this test suite. In fact, it was one of the use lines I deleted. :-)

Using it for the require test hadn't occurred to me, though. I'll switch to that. Thanks. Edit: How would I replicate the OP's BAIL_OUT semantics when using lives_ok?

Edit: Either you edited your reply, or I didn't see you answering the bit about why the test failed unless Test::Warnings was included. That makes perfect sense.

Comment on Re^2: Unit test of script fails unless Test::Warnings is used?! Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Unit test of script fails unless Test::Warnings is used?! by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Oct 13, 2019 at 01:28 UTC
See also (perhaps instead) Test::Fatal.	[reply]
Re^3: Unit test of script fails unless Test::Warnings is used?! by 1nickt (Canon) on Oct 13, 2019 at 01:35 UTC
"Edit: How would I replicate the OP's BAIL_OUT semantics when using lives_ok?" `lives_ok sub { require 'script' } or BAIL_OUT("bin/script did not load: $@");` [download] :-) To make your test suite stop any time a test fails: `use Test::Most 'die';` [download] (Although you cannot control the output as with `BAIL_OUT`, and it will apply to all tests in the file.) (Note that Test::Most loads Test::More and Test::Exception as well as others and `warnings` and `strict`.) Hope this helps! Update: showed one-test solution first The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Unit test of script fails unless Test::Warnings is used?! by 1nickt (Canon) on Oct 13, 2019 at 01:27 UTC
Because Test::Warnings runs a test of its own, so the harness is satisfied. Output of your test script using Test::Warnings under `--verbose`: `$ prove -lrv 11107390.t 11107390.t .. ok 1 - no (unexpected) warnings (via done_testing) 1..1 ok All tests successful.` [download] Hope this helps! The way forward always starts with a minimal test.	[reply] [d/l] [select]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks