Re^2: RFC: new module WebService::Discord::Webhook

Haha. The one comment I've gotten on Reddit was to change the name to this (from Net::Discord::Webhook) - the PAUSE guide recommends using either WWW or WebService when referring to modules that interoperate with a web-based service.

Two hardest problems in computer science, indeed...

Comment on Re^2: RFC: new module WebService::Discord::Webhook

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: new module WebService::Discord::Webhook by holli (Abbot) on Sep 03, 2019 at 20:25 UTC
Yeah well, then, just append append something to furher qualify the real nature? Ideas: `WebService::Discord::Webhook::(Client\|Interface\|Call\|SendTo)` holli You can lead your users to water, but alas, you cannot drown them.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: RFC: new module WebService::Discord::Webhook by Anonymous Monk on Sep 05, 2019 at 01:20 UTC
`Yeah well, then, just append append something to furher qualify the r +eal nature? Ideas: WebService::Discord::Webhook::(Client\|Interface\|Call\|SendTo)` [download] Documentation clarifies name doesn't it? A webhook is an object and an endpoint "Payload URL" Lots of examples good and bad https://metacpan.org/search?p=1&q=module:WebService::&size=500 https://metacpan.org/search?p=1&q=module:WWW::&size=500 https://metacpan.org/search?p=1&q=Webhook&size=500	[reply] [d/l]


Think about Loose Coupling
	PerlMonks