Re^7: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?

And this particular monk has contributed over 200 negative posts.

500/23774 = 2.1%
I've also contributed 2 with a reputation over 200; 29 with a reputation over 100; and 150 that exceed his best ever of a paltry 69
200/7798 = 2.56%

Now who's the bad guy?

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

Comment on Re^7: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts? by LanX (Saint) on May 26, 2019 at 02:35 UTC
> and 150 that exceed his best ever of a paltry 69 Now let's look at the details and eliminate the decline in votes over the years. My 5 best rated post are Re: I want you to convince me to learn Perl 69 rep 2013-09-25 01:04 Re: Syntax explanation required 64 rep 2013-01-02 13:35 simple as math 58 rep 2013-12-24 21:33 Deflation and "Selected Best Nodes" 57 rep 2014-01-07 16:16 Re: eq vs == 55 rep 2009-11-10 13:06 Your best nodes per year 2013 Re: Is this ancient perl or just a cargo cult? 56 rep 2013-11-01 06:20 2014 is Re^2: Check randomly generated numbers have not been used before 66 rep 2014-06-20 21:28 2009 is Re: sorting very large text files 79 rep 2009-12-19 09:07 * I must admit I expected a bigger gap between Great BUK vs mini me. (Even that I personally don't give much about the up-vote stats and all their flaws, I'm afraid this might really hurt your ego ... sorry! ) Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice} *) minus my up-vote to see the result update and to be fair your negative posts per year `{ 2002 => 5, 2003 => 15, 2004 => 38, 2005 => 109, 2006 => 41, 2007 => 21, 2008 => 18, 2009 => 13, 2010 => 91, 2011 => 49, 2012 => 32, 2013 => 19, 2014 => 6, 2015 => 17, 2016 => 25, 2017 => 10, 2018 => 10, 2019 => 4, }` [download] That's 294 since I joined, almost 4 times more than "paltry" me.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts? (updated) by LanX (Saint) on May 25, 2019 at 22:37 UTC
Your numbers of my negative posts are wrong. (by factor 3). And this even after you started down-voting old posts of mine. * update Regarding the vanity about your best posts - sigh - all top 50 were written before I even joined. It's a commonplace that it was far easier to collect reputation in the golden past. Otherwise brilliant "late comers" like haukex and choroba would easily be top twenty and ten respectively. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice} *) Though I'm not sure about the effect of my "fan club", because mass down votes used to be corrected by the vote fairy IIRC. update poultry?	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re^7: Something changed the creation time/date of all my posts?

update

update

update