Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

by LanX (Saint)
on May 17, 2019 at 16:25 UTC ( [id://11100191]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real
in thread RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

> You're a pmdevil, let's see some patches

It's true I'm in pmhell, and I already digged thru all those wikis and chromatic libraries.

Basically I'd need a standalone dev version of the monastery for testing.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

  • Comment on Re^3: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on May 17, 2019 at 18:10 UTC
    Basically I'd need a standalone dev version of the monastery for testing.

    In fact. This is probably the biggest hurdle for me. I like the freedom to be stupid when I’m developing and that’s impossible working on (semi-) live code.

      why can't you have one? Also I thought PM was on multiple servers so can you not break one and then the others will still work?

        I just don’t think there are any deployment processes. I could probably put one together but it would take a lot of work, it might be tricky given my dev.darwin v production.xyz, and it would be empty without permission to copy over the whole DB (semi-effectively promoting me to Godhood since I could see all data).

        Update: also, from my perspective… the site code should be nuked from orbit. I don’t see anything here that I don’t feel would be better and easier (to write, to test, to maintain, to rope in help) on any modern framework. I got a commit bit to try to encourage myself to try to work with what’s here but like a New Year’s Resolution gym membership… I have nothing but appreciation and admiration for the active devs keeping the site going and nudging it toward new features.

      Yep, but to avoid misunderstandings:

      I didn't want to criticize the infrastructure or formulate feature requests.

      The thread is RFC and I honestly think that automatic categories are easier than manual tagging and the involved coordination and discussion.

      IOW was meant as a helpful suggestion nothing else.

      update

      And my first project if I found the time would be to open the code for pluggable frontends, such that others could easily provide different addons to change the look and feel. (Themes++)

      Like that bootstrap design from Tobyink.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://11100191]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 01:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found