Multi-stage flip-flop?by RonW (Parson)
|on Dec 10, 2014 at 23:30 UTC||Need Help??|
In a response to a SOPW post, I wrote:
Which doesn't work.
Occurs to me that it might be a useful enhancement to allow .. conditionX to be an additional stage to the preceding condition1 .. condition2, creating a linked cascade of flip-flops:
The semantics would be an extension of .. In the second example, match1 would trigger stage 1 (doStage1() will be called). Then match2 will end stage 1 and trigger stage 2 (doStage2() will be called). Then match3 ends stage 2 and triggers stage 3 (doStage3() will be called). Finally, match4 resets the cascade.
Updated to mention the first example doesn't work.
Updated second example and the description of the semmantics.