Re^3: perltidy for ternary operator?by LanX (Cardinal)
|on Dec 06, 2014 at 19:06 UTC||Need Help??|
That's a suggestion ("you can") for the case you expect new entries to come.
But that's not a problem with perltidy, cause cascades (as demonstrated) would be fixed automatically.
And I doubt that breaking simple ternaries would be appreciated by the majority.
It might interest you that tidy's output of a simple ternaries depends on existing linebreaks: (see -bot option)¹
Since the documentation mentions ternaries only once for -bot I doubt your goal can be achieved! (i.e. without patching the code)
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
¹) i.a.W if you expect the ternary to be cascaded in the future then enter a linebreak manually.