note
wjw
<p>
Thanks for that BrowserUK. Those points are informative to me, and seem to be on the money.<p>Clearly the example I used is a poor one for having tried to make the point I was attempting to make. (My lack of depth of knowledge in the arena). Perhaps our understanding of language is driving our innovation in hardware instead of the reverse. I wonder what might happen if the reverse was approached more aggressively. Maybe that is what is happening at a certain level in the fields of bio-mimicry and maybe even in quantum computing.
<p>At any rate, I think you are right; hardware does not affect languages at this point in time, but I don't doubt that it will in the future. I find it hard to believe that all machine languages by nature have to operate at the basic level in one of two states. I think the success thus far has limited the innovation. <p> I have gone way off track relative to the original post and suspect I better stop. Thanks for the interesting meditation.
</p>
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-310300">
<!-- Node text goes above. Div tags should contain sig only -->
<div class="pmsig">
<p><i>...the majority is always wrong, and always the last to know about it...</i></p>
<p><i>Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...</i></p>
<p><i>A solution is nothing more than a clearly stated problem...otherwise, the problem is not a problem, it is simply an inconvenient fact</i></p>
<div class="pmsig-310300">[id://310300] </div>
</div>
</div></div>
1105966
1106605