Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: The future of Perl?

by syphilis (Bishop)
on Nov 05, 2014 at 11:07 UTC ( #1106178=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: The future of Perl?
in thread The future of Perl?

"Oh, you're a Perl guy? I'll try not to hold that against you."

A while back on the PDL mailing list, Karl Glazebrook proposed that the collective noun for a gathering of python programmers be a "smug".
It occurred to me that python programmers might, in response, assert that the collective noun for a group of perl5 programmers is a "cemetery".

Any thoughts on the collective noun for a group of perl6 programmers ? ... an "hallucination" perhaps ?

;-)

Cheers,
Rob

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: The future of Perl?
by jdporter (Canon) on Nov 11, 2014 at 13:44 UTC

    A hallucination, maybe, if we're going to pronounce English properly.

      Only in 'ertford, 'ereford and 'ampshire. Elsewhere it 'ardly hever 'appens :-)

      Jenda
      Enoch was right!
      Enjoy the last years of Rome.

      Poor ol' Lucy Nations.

Re^4: The future of Perl?
by QM (Parson) on Nov 11, 2014 at 10:13 UTC
    Perl 6: Blue Sky? Bleeding Ledge? Daydream?

    My outlook for Perl 6 is still positive, though it has certainly taken its time. Perhaps if it had been "finished" 10 years ago, we wouldn't be having this discussion?

    -QM
    --
    Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1106178]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2021-02-28 22:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?