http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1106117


in reply to Re: The future of Perl?
in thread The future of Perl?

Your anecdote reminds me of something that happened to me at work just a few days ago. A "data scientist" -- young guy, very hip -- saw over my shoulder that I was working on some Perl, and he quipped with a smirk, "Oh, you're a Perl guy? I'll try not to hold that against you."

My immediate thought was, "Oh, you're a douchebag? I'll try not to hold that against you!"

Point is, Perl has a uniformly bad reputation among whole generations of programmers. Although a few of us know better, it's still a reality which will be changed neither by Awesome New Version!!1! nor by version number manipulexyacculation.

I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The future of Perl?
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Nov 05, 2014 at 11:07 UTC
    "Oh, you're a Perl guy? I'll try not to hold that against you."

    A while back on the PDL mailing list, Karl Glazebrook proposed that the collective noun for a gathering of python programmers be a "smug".
    It occurred to me that python programmers might, in response, assert that the collective noun for a group of perl5 programmers is a "cemetery".

    Any thoughts on the collective noun for a group of perl6 programmers ? ... an "hallucination" perhaps ?

    ;-)

    Cheers,
    Rob

      A hallucination, maybe, if we're going to pronounce English properly.

        Only in 'ertford, 'ereford and 'ampshire. Elsewhere it 'ardly hever 'appens :-)

        Jenda
        Enoch was right!
        Enjoy the last years of Rome.

        Poor ol' Lucy Nations.

      Perl 6: Blue Sky? Bleeding Ledge? Daydream?

      My outlook for Perl 6 is still positive, though it has certainly taken its time. Perhaps if it had been "finished" 10 years ago, we wouldn't be having this discussion?

      -QM
      --
      Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of