Re: The future of Perl?

by Your Mother (Archbishop)

on Nov 04, 2014 at 04:12 UTC ( #1105969=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

PERL IS DEAD!!!

Am I doing it right? :P

Comment on Re: The future of Perl?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: The future of Perl? by AnomalousMonk (Bishop) on Nov 04, 2014 at 04:47 UTC
NO!!!!! MORE EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!!!!!! AND BOLDFACE!!!!!!!!!!!!	[reply]
Re^2: The future of Perl? (ded) by tye (Sage) on Nov 04, 2014 at 14:17 UTC
That's the answer! Rather than tilt against the windmill of getting "Perl 6" renamed to remove the "dead end" sign from Perl 5's future, just rename the "not going to Perl 6" fork of Perl 5... to "Ded". - tye	[reply]
Re^2: The future of Perl? by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Nov 05, 2014 at 10:14 UTC
"Perl is not dead, it just smells funny." (freely adapted from Frank Zappa (1940-1993)) ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1105969]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others studying the Monastery: (3)

As of 2021-02-28 22:05 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found

Notices^?