There's more than one way to do things | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: Strict Clean JAPH (reap socket obfuscation)by Anonymous Monk |
on Aug 10, 2014 at 07:19 UTC ( [id://1096892]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hi marto I'd hope that this is obvious to most. It's not a good idea to send an "unknown" payload to a system which you do not own. The link I gave shows what the tool this script is based on (well, essentially is) does. It's downright dishonest to post this here under the guise of an obfuscated JAPH Yeah, it was obvious without running the "obfuscation" that it opens a Socket and talks on it What is not obvious is why that should be reaped You offered a link as a reason to reap, but the link is also obfuscated :) it doesn't explain the reasoning The posting qualifies under ?node_id=237057#obfu The current guidelines say
So , where does sending unknown payloads to systems you don't own fall? I think it falls under stupid/annoying... Consider simple eval
Consider Re: perl Tk help and Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism? (legalese) Hi marto
In Section
Obfuscated Code
|
|