Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $

I may be mistaken, but I'm think that $c+=1 is actually defined to run the two steps one right after the other, while what is ambiguous in $c++ is the fact that $c will be incremented later.

I do agree on the fact that undefined behaviour does not mean undefined value, that's why it's hard to track.

Comment on Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ? Select or Download Code


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks

Re^5: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?