Removing NodeReaper from Our Best Users

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Removing NodeReaper from Our Best Users by footpad (Abbot) on Aug 23, 2001 at 07:34 UTC
No. If people don't like the fact that he's there, well, then they can contribute more answers to FAQ's, tutorials, reviews, CUFP's, and so on. The Reaper is a warning and a reminder. Post responsibly and help your companions. Besides, do you wanna be the one to tell he he's not one of our best assets? He's touchy enough about that whole picture thing. You gonna tell him? I'm not gonna tell him, you tell him. I know, let's get tilly; he hates everyone. He told him. snicker, snack Hey, tilly... Sorry; couldn't resist. I've met tilly and I know he can take a joke. :-) --f	[reply]
Re: Removing NodeReaper from Our Best Users by lemming (Priest) on Aug 23, 2001 at 06:52 UTC
I think of him as a good user to have around and consider him one of the best. Though maybe I'm just trying to curry favor... I am curious why # of writeups on Our Best Users doesn't match up with homenode numbers. Worst skew is with Nodereaper at -38/279. boo_radley is off by 6, tilly by 2, etc...	[reply]
(ichimunki) Re: Removing NodeReaper from Our Best Users by ichimunki (Priest) on Aug 23, 2001 at 20:28 UTC
As long as NodeReaper never makes it onto Saints in our Book, I don't mind. As it is, it's a good indication of just how many nodes have needed removal. I don't even see a link to Best Users in any of the nodelets I have turned on.	[reply]
Re: Removing NodeReaper from Our Best Users by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Aug 23, 2001 at 10:27 UTC
If you'll do that, also remove QandAEditors since that's a group or office not a single person. I agree, if you want him off the list, get 5 other users to pass him up! Come on boo_radley, you're gaining on him! —John The Most Prolific PerlMonk	[reply]


There's more than one way to do things
	PerlMonks