Do you somehow think it contradicts what I said?
You're not very good at this are you.
- "Code simplification."
What is the justification for "simplifying" code that has worked perfectly well for a dozen or more releases?
- Does is improve performance? No.
- Does make things more secure? No.
- Does it radically reduce compilation time? No.
- Does it reduce the number of tests that are needed? No.
- Does the simplification remove a dependency upon some external library or tool or exotic skillset? No.
- "maintaining the level of security"
You mean, as far as its been considered, it probably didn't make things any worse.
- You omitted to mention: "broke a bunch of other people code for no good reason"
A huge, resounding, emphatic: YES!
Contradict? No.
Show up for the pointless, meaningless, politically motivated, incomplete and non-useful diatribe it is. Abso-frickin-lutely.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |