Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: anonymous vs named subroutines as closures

by Clovis_Sangrail (Beadle)
on Jun 03, 2013 at 15:46 UTC ( [id://1036797]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to anonymous vs named subroutines as closures

Thanks, these are all very helpful responses, and an interesting look 'under the hood' of Perl. (And the temptation to henceforth declare *all* my variables as typeglobs passed quickly :) )

  • Comment on Re: anonymous vs named subroutines as closures

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1036797]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-04-19 07:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found