Re: All your Votebots are belong to us

re "abusing the system": does that mean any form of casting votes that are not in line with the post's content and social context, or just the use of an automated system to do so?

It's really easy to just find a long thread and click on everything to use up the day's votes for the bonus, without really reading the post. So, should you make the voter system test you for reading comprehension before accepting the vote?

—John

(wondering if this satire will be punctuated by the irony of being massivly downvoted)

Comment on Re: All your Votebots are belong to us

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: All your Votebots are belong to us by lemming (Priest) on Aug 09, 2001 at 03:37 UTC
Hmmm. I think the biggest abuse by votebots are targeting specific users though the behaviour you mention could trigger a false positive. Not knowing how fearless leader is monitoring the situation, I'm not sure. update: jepri: yes	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: All your Votebots are belong to us by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Aug 09, 2001 at 06:49 UTC
False positive? You mean someone using non-mechanical means to frivilously spend votes could make vroom think it's a votebot? I don't know. How often do you read a thread, then click on a bunch of (presumably worthy) nodes and hit VOTE? This submits the whole thread in one form, and is typical behavior. —John	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: All your Votebots are belong to us by jepri (Parson) on Aug 09, 2001 at 03:45 UTC
And I doubt that we will ever know the search criteria. Which is good, because Perl is flexible enough to beat almost any search criterium. ____________________ Jeremy I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.	[reply]
Re^4: All your Votebots are belong to us by tadman (Prior) on Aug 10, 2001 at 05:13 UTC
A dead giveaway: `UserAgent: VoteBot/1.0 (UNIX; Perl 5.6.1)`	[reply] [d/l]


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks