Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re^2: better array to hash conversion

by perltux (Monk)
on Dec 11, 2012 at 14:27 UTC ( #1008309=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: better array to hash conversion
in thread better array to hash conversion

Many thanks for that. I find it very interesting that the 'for' loop is actually the second fastest solution, faster than the solutions using 'map'.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: better array to hash conversion
by space_monk (Chaplain) on Dec 11, 2012 at 19:34 UTC

    A for solution is generally faster than a map, and it has been discussed in map versus for amongst other places. Sometimes however it is more expressive to use "map".

    A Monk aims to give answers to those who have none, and to learn from those who know more.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1008309]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2022-12-01 17:22 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?