good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Point Releasesby RMGir (Prior) |
on Jan 07, 2003 at 15:15 UTC ( [id://224987]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I disagree, belg4mit.
I don't check here very often, so "Newest nodes" are too ephemeral for me. Unless someone has replied to one of my nodes, how can I know the discussion has been updated? If we had a "subscribe to this node for update notifications" feature, then I'd agree that 1.1-style notices should go in as replies to the old node, but as the site stands, I'm glad that update was a top-level node, where I'm more likely to see it.
That being said, I still ++'d your node, it seems like a reasonable point to discuss. It's a bit odd that it stands at -7 XP atm, but I understand we all have very different up/downvote criteria...
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|