note
Aristotle
<p>Isn't all this other code just as broken if it uses <tt>prepare_cached</tt> with [cpan://DBD::Sybase]? And if it doesn’t use <tt>prepare_cached</tt> with [cpan://DBD::Sybase], why would it be affected? And if you patch [cpan://Class::DBI] instead, wouldn’t that affect all CDBI apps, even those that shouldn’t be, like someone whipping up some quick using [cpan://DBD::SQLite] off at a corner of the environment? Patching [cpan://DBD::Sybase] seems to scope the fix to the right layer, whereas patching CDBI would be a scattershot that would affect code which shouldn’t be and miss code that should be.</p>
<p>(Note: I’m not arrogating any say in your decision, just pointing out what seems like a mistake to me. The call is obviously yours since you’re the one who’ll have to live with the consequences.)</p>
<p align="right" class="pmsig pmsig-114691"><i>Makeshifts last the longest.</i></p>
7568
519086